نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار روابط بین الملل دانشگاه اصفهان
2 استادیار روابط بین الملل دانشگاه اصفهان
3 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین الملل دانشگاه اصفهان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The ties between the U.S and Iran in the decades after the Islamic Revolution of Iran was on the pattern of conflict and divergence. Therefore, it can be said that Ideological conflict was the base and the main factor behind this meme. Over the years the U.S has tried to use various pretexts to deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran. During the past decade, Iran's nuclear program was an excuse for its conflict behavior, and in this regard coercive diplomacy has been the main U.S policy toward Iran.This study was an attempt to review the U.S coercive diplomacy against Iran's nuclear program. The main question is that what are the tools used by the U.S in its coercive diplomacy towards Iran's nuclear program, and what are the effects of this diplomacy on Iran's nuclear activities. To answer this question it was hypothesized that economic sanctions and military threats are the main tools for the U.S coercive diplomacy towards Iran's nuclear activities. Moreover, the U.S was able to use this tools to impose significant limitations on Iran's nuclear program. The research methodology was case study in which documents and library studies were used to collect the data.
کلیدواژهها [English]
http://preprod.iipdigital.getusinfo.com/st/persian/texttrans/20100
20.متقی، ابراهیم (1392)؛ بررسی ابعاد رهیافت مقاومت در نظام بینالملل؛ نظریهای فراگیر در نظام جهانی، قابلدسترسی در:
http://www.farsnews.com/printable.php?nn=13920223001090
21.مشیرزاده، حمیرا و هرمز جعفری (1390)؛ "قدرت هژمون و دولتهای انقلابی: مطالعه موردی آمریکا و جمهوری اسلامی ایران"، فصلنامه روابط خارجی، سال چهارم، شماره اول،
22.مشرق نیوز (16/2/1394)؛ دو مقام سیاسی آمریکایی که ایران را تهدید نظامی کردند قابلدسترسی در: www.mashreghnews.ir/fa/news/413191
23.نامه رهبر انقلاب به رئیسجمهور درباره توافق هستهای (29/7/1394)
24. هیلاری کلینتون در انجمن سابان ایران را تهدید به حمله نظامی کرد، سایت اشراف، قابلدسترسی در: http://www.eshraf.ir
25.George, Alexander (1994); Theory and Practice, in Alexander L. George and William E. Simons, eds., The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy, 2nd edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.Huntington, S (1999), " The Lonely Superpower", Foreign Affairs.No78
27.Jakobsen, Peter (1998) Western Use The Coercive Diplomacy After The Cold War New York: St. Martin's Press
28.Jacobson, Michael (2008), "sanction against Iran:A Promising Struggle", Washington Quarterly
29.Jervic, Robert(2013), The use of "coercive diplomacy" by the United States of America against Iran, Foreign Affairs,Junuary-February
30.Lew, Jacob (June 30, 2013), "Conversation with ASPEN Ideas Festival 2013", The ASPEN Institute,http://www.aspenideas.org/sites/default/files/images/AIF-Pages/In-Conversation-with-Jacob-Lew.pd
31.Maloney, Suzanne (January 5, 2012); "Obama's Counterproductive New Iran Sanctions: How Washington is Sliding toward Regime Change", Foreign Affairs.
32.Miller, Steven E. (2012); "Nuclear weapons 2011: Momentum slows, reality returns",Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
33.Obama, barak (2007) "Renewing American Leadership" Foreign Affairs. Vol 86. No 4 July/August
34.Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (August 22, 2012); Report of the Secretary-General on the Situation of Human Rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/IR/A-HRC-22-48_en.pdf
35.Waltz. Kenneth (2012), Why Iran Should Get the Bommb, Foreign Policy, July, August.
36.Zakaria, Fareed (October 27, 2011); "To deal with Irans nuclear future, go back to 2008",http://www.washingtonpost.com
)