نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی
نویسندگان
1 دافوس آجا
2 دانشکده علوم و فنون فارابی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Considering the increasing importance of the legitimacy of the use of force in international relations and the role of religious teachings in explaining the limits of defense, this research has conducted a comparative study of the concept of self-defense in the Holy Quran and the United Nations Charter. The main objective of the research is to identify and analyze the similarities and differences in the principles, conditions, and goals of self-defense in these two normative systems. The data were collected through library studies and document analysis and were examined using the method of directional qualitative content analysis and conceptual coding.The results of the study showed that both systems emphasize the principle of reactive defense against aggression, necessity and proportionality in the use of force, and consider self-defense as an exception to the principle of prohibition of resorting to force. At the same time, data analysis shows that the basis of the legitimacy of defense in the Holy Quran is mainly based on justice, eliminating oppression, and protecting human dignity, while in the United Nations Charter, self-defense is defined more in the context of preserving the sovereignty of states and maintaining international peace and security. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that there is significant convergence between the two systems in the principles of limiting violence, but the difference in the normative foundations and goals of defense has formed two distinct approaches.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)