نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی
نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی
2 دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The phenomenon of migration has evolved from a simple population movement into one of the most complex and challenging issues in International Relations. Meanwhile, destination countries, particularly in the West, are increasingly defining migration within a security framework instead of addressing it as a humanitarian or economic issue. This article seeks to answer the question of what the similarities and differences are in the securitization of migration from the perspective of three critical security schools: Copenhagen, Paris, and Aberystwyth. The Copenhagen School, focusing on securitization and the speech act, analyzes migration through existential threats to the state (the securitizing actor) and national identity. In contrast, the Paris School, viewing security as a discipline of practice that goes beyond discourse, emphasizes the role of institutions, bureaucracies, and professional actors in the management and control of migration. Finally, the Aberystwyth School defines security not for the state but for the individual and within the framework of human security, viewing migration as an opportunity for emancipation. This article is conducted using a descriptive-analytical and comparative research method, utilizing library resources and documentary data.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)